A state appeals court has ruled that the city of
Jacksonville had the right to arrest a man who walked into a local credit union
with a pistol on his hip in 2011. But if
Jason Dean Tulley did the same thing today, his attorney claims, it would be
perfectly legal. Tulley, a Jacksonville
resident, was arrested and fined $200 after entering First Educators Credit
Union wearing an openly visible handgun in a hip holster. According to court
documents, Tulley argued with a police officer who asked him to return the
pistol to his vehicle, but later did return the gun to his truck, and
re-entered the bank. He was arrested a few days later and fined $200 for
"carrying a pistol on premises not his own." For decades, Alabama law
prohibited people from openly carrying handguns except on their own property or
on property under their control, though people with concealed-carry permits
could carry hidden weapons in most places.
Tulley's arrest became a
cause for Alabama's open-carry
activists, who argue that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry
guns openly in public places. Like many other open-carry activists, Tulley made
a video recording of his encounter with the Jacksonville police officer and
posted it on YouTube. Open-carry
activists raised money to help Tulley fight the arrest in circuit court and
later in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. Tulley argued that the state's
law against openly carrying handguns on other people's property was
unconstitutionally vague. While the appeals court debated Tulley's case,
similar arguments were making their way through the Alabama Legislature. In a
move supported by gun-rights activists — and opposed by many sheriffs and
police chiefs — state lawmakers in 2013 passed a law that made getting
concealed-carry permits easier and allowed open carrying of firearms on most
private property unless the owners expressly prohibit it, typically by posting
a “no-guns” sign. In a 26-page decision handed down in Feb. 28, the appeals
court denied most of Tulley's claims. Drawing on case law and rulings of
attorneys general from the 1800s to the 21st century, the five-judge panel
rejected Tulley's assertions that the credit union was a public place and that
state law laid out no specific punishment for violating open-carry law.
No comments:
Post a Comment