Sen. Del Marsh |
An attorney with the Alabama Attorney General’s
Office filed a motion friday seeking to
dismiss what he called an incomprehensible court challenge against state Senate
President Pro Tem Del Marsh, of Anniston.
The challenge came from 11 state residents referring to themselves
“relators” instead of plaintiffs. They filed what they called a writ of quo
warranto “in accordance with Matthew 5:25” which urges quick resolution of
disputes with one’s adversary Assistant Attorney General Jeff Long filed
the motion to dismiss before Montgomery County Circuit Judge William
Shashy. At a preliminary hearing earlier
this month, Shashy was visibly frustrated by the terminology used heavily
footnoted challenge to Marsh. The 11
people involved with the challenge brought a more concise document to the
hearing at Shashy’s request. According to Long’s motion, the relators wanted to
bar Sen. Marsh from office and declare that the Legislature does not possess
the authority to revise the state constitution.
to take Marsh out of office because of legislation
he sponsored to revise the Alabama constitution.
Citing court cases and state law that give precedence to
his arguments, Long wrote that the relators failed to provide a specific
offense and that their complaint “is that they politically disagree with
Senator Marsh’s actions and for that reason, he should be removed from office.”
Marsh, Long added, is entitled to legislative immunity from lawsuits so long as
he does not break his oath of office.
The motion also states that a writ of quo warranto can
only be used to unseat an official who is unfit to hold office, for reasons
such as being a convicted felon or living outside the district of the office.
The relators do not challenge those qualifications.
No comments:
Post a Comment